00:00
The Financial Ways
The Financial Ways
USD/RUB
EUR/RUB
Cryptocurrency

Lazarus Group launders $30M via Hyperliquid as US talks intensify

Wallets linked to the North Korean state-sponsored Lazarus Group have liquidated more than $30 million in Bitcoin through the decentralized exchange Hyperliquid over the past three weeks. The activity coincides with ongoing discussions between Payward and U.S. regulators to bring the platform’s derivatives products into the domestic market.

Lazarus Group launders $30M via Hyperliquid as US talks intensify

Blockchain data from Arkham Intelligence reveals that the illicit funds were converted into Ethereum and Solana before being funneled into centralized exchanges, including Kraken, LBank, and KuCoin. While the transfers highlight persistent vulnerabilities in decentralized finance, officials emphasize that public ledger records do not confirm whether the receiving platforms were aware of the source of the assets.

Regulatory hurdles for Hyperliquid

The U.S. Treasury Department maintains strict sanctions against the Lazarus Group, citing its involvement in major cyber thefts like the 2022 Ronin Network attack. These latest transfers underscore the difficulty of enforcing compliance on permissionless protocols, where users connect wallets directly without traditional brokerage oversight. Kraken and other exchanges noted that while they employ industry-standard monitoring, public blockchain data often obscures the final destination of funds once they leave the decentralized ecosystem.

As these transactions occur, Payward is engaged in advanced talks with Hyperliquid Labs to offer selected perpetual contracts to U.S. traders via Bitnomial, a CFTC-regulated entity. The proposed arrangement seeks to integrate Hyperliquid’s high-volume infrastructure into a framework that meets federal requirements for customer identification and sanctions screening. With Hyperliquid having processed over $5.19 trillion in cumulative volume, the potential entry into the U.S. market hinges on whether the platform can effectively implement permissioned access controls to prevent sanctioned actors from exploiting its liquidity.

Share

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

No comments yet. Be the first!